Reform of Basel 2 and the Capital Requirements Directive

13 May 2009

In October 2008, the EU Commission proposed revisions to the Capital Requirements Directive designed to reinforce the stability of the financial system, reduce risk exposure and improve supervision of banks that operate in more than one EU country. These proposals should be adopted in May 2009.

At the same time, there has been questioning of whether Basel 2, which is in the course of its implementation around the world (the CRD is the EU implementation of it), is still relevant or whether the financial crisis has shown it to be inadequate. Basel 2 has three "pillars": Pillar 1 is a formulaic approach to capital based on applying risk percentages to assets in a structured way; Pillar 2 requires management to assess the risks of the business more holistically and the capital needed to support those risks, and (critically) the regulators to review and approve that approach; Pillar 3 requires extended disclosure. The implementation of Pillar 3 has not yet taken place, but there is a general consensus that models used in Pillar 1 were inadequate, in particular they did not force banks to build counter-cyclical provisions into their capital rations, and that the correct application of Pillar 2 will be essential if Basel 2 is to prove itself.

The disruption in the market has brought in two other factors that cut across the pillars. Firstly, the whole issue of valuation and how Basel standards and accounting standards of valuation interconnect or conflict. Secondly, there are the implications of large scale government intervention, especially in the context of the process of re-capitalisation as envisaged in Pillar 2.

Attendance at this conference will be invaluable for senior management of all banks and building societies, including those individuals responsible for compliance, legal affairs, group risk management, credit risk, operational risk, operations, regulatory reporting and financial reporting.

Media Partners